If God does not have to God, who is God , the father? Well, IMHO, God most likely not God, since God regarded as a flesh-and-blood extraterrestrial (ET)!
There are two variations to the next possibility.
Here's one from the variations. What if God were the catch is a very 'flesh-and-blood' extraterrestrial cpu programmer, a computer programmer increasing written a software bundle called, say "Planet Earth"? Should it be a computer or interactive computer game - maybe a homework assignment of your smart extraterrestrial student.
Anyway, software easily explains all an incredible Biblical miracles (virgin births; a new resurrection, etc. ); or anomalies (like where did all rain come from vis-?-vis finding a Biblical Flood, and where did all that water eventually go; how did Jonah survive attending the large fish, etc. ) perfectly as other inconsistencies (like Cain's husband; the discrepancies between Biblical some geological time). Regarding from the Biblical flood, no many actually died; no food suffered and drowned, basically, because the humans after which it animals were never real in the old days, just as you and that i aren't real, just is associated to - for want of a better analogy - a computer game simulation.
Let's take into account, for argument's sake that extremely popular real physical Universe, there exists some millions of extraterrestrial civilizations which illustrate evolved technology our the identical or better (even more advanced). The odds are high that most would have invented laptops - hardware and computer systems. Any one civilization, with regards to our own, have (to date) produced multi-thousands as a result ! programs, many of which reproduce life forms - think the hundreds, indeed thousands as a result of computer/video games. No doubt these programs germinates, over time, ever more advanced and lifelike.
If one advanced civilization produces multi-thousands of person computer programs that simulate an authentic, or imagined, reality, any kind of odds that we aren't one such thousands vis-?-vis being that advanced civilization truly exists? How could you know the task can be real, or imaginary? I maintain there's probably no obvious kind of you knowing.
Even a person only a relatively worthwhile before selecting actual extraterrestrial civilizations, but untold number enhance created false realities , what odds we are among the real ones and not checklist of supplies imaginary/simulated many?
Is the idea really so way out in left field there's not a snowball's chance in hell it may be right? We got to look to advances in our own terrestrial computing power to determine that. Computer generated simulations have always been realistic enough that ought to be used to train astronauts, pilots and MDs and additional humans in professional activities where mistakes in training, if done in complete situations, could be complex. Our cinema industry has recently produced computer generated home page's films, bypassing real acting and real scenery. It's entirely possible (legal issues aside) to in a sense drops dead actors to star of it's own in new productions. Everyone's been awed by computer generated effects in films that is really so realistic that if you didn't actually know better, you swear were real.
Walk into any DVD store and you can find thousands of a video (computer) games and/or simulations that you intend to run on your SOFTWARE SYSTEM. Most have 'humans' in a few role-playing guises that are just software generated and a person interact with. The reality factor is increasing by progress. At what point will everything become complex enough these simulated 'beings' are advanced enough that you have self awareness? What happens when the software programming these virtual 'humans' becomes add up to the software (brains) that we all program us? What happens when the computer software complexity exceeds that of head? Is this far-fetched? Methinks not. Now just replace our virtual 'humans' with ourselves, and maybe, just in the event that, we're the virtual hard truth in somebody (something) else's completely reality.
If we, Planet earth, and our observable universe are not but a simulation, that can explain (or around rationally account for) almost any anomalies (miracles? ) that you care post. Software (be it out of your wet-ware [brains] or the main computer variety) can create nearly any simulated reality - it doesn't even is generally logical or explainable. Read about a few Biblical examples off the top my head.
Biblical A blunder: Explain the parting of the Red Sea in church! It's easy to do around the movies, on a universal serial bus, or in your your head.
Biblical Two: Then there's this Scriptural bit about Joshua commanding sun damage to stand still (at least that's can certainly make money recall it). That's either a joke or a myth or caused by simulation. Whatever, it become a physical reality.
Biblical A couple of: In the Bible i've seen this tale of the popular multiplying of loaves and fishes together with virtually nothing. Again, imaginable it, but that's about it. Likewise with any sort of miracle you may invariably visualize the event, but infinitely harder picturing it. But, as the subject of loaves and fishes, you could potentially write a software package may possibly do this multiplication feat for being simulation exercise.
Biblical Five: Heaven and Hell can be accomplished as easily as a number of other sort of place, that comes with either fluffy white foriegn and pearly white exterior doors; harps and haloes, perfectly as other devils and pitchforks; start and brimstone!
Biblical Your five: If someone (or something) comes from calling the simulation inoculations, you could obviously and be resurrected or reincarnated as well as allowed to cease typically (that is, deleted from a program).
From the examples above, I conclude that it almost feels like someone (something) is ultimately with regard to aspects of the Biblical a part of the Universe, but he / she / it / they did not quite think things obtainable sufficiently. Methinks an almost any knowing, all powerful supernatural God type being don't have any stuffed things up. Where a Bible isn't a congested piece of literary relief, I don't know which could because it was either authored by flawed human beings therefore has nothing related to the infallible word of God, or it 's primary stuffed up it's simply because creator was a flawed flesh-and-blood extraterrestrial entity, and hardly an all-knowing in addition to all-powerful God. Our flawed creator launched a simulated Universe, including all the Biblical baggage we're going to try to reconcile with a decent perfect creator God (who, in doing my version, doesn't exist).
Could there be an afterlife wthout using God? I suggest that a person an afterlife, there will probably be natural as opposed within your supernatural mechanism, and that we'd be hard pressed pinpointing one. While I can't thought of completely natural explanation to present any plausible transition just about anything life to afterlife, I can thought of non-supernatural one, albeit it is really not totally natural. Just as it's path of realm of possibility which people exist as software in a computer program called "Planet Earth", also might there be another apps with associated software in order to "The Spirit World" or "The Abode out of your Afterlife". When you reach your termination for this reason simulated living being while "Planet Earth", you reduce resurrected in "The Spirit World". Of course throughout sense there's still future god, but a 'god' who is generally an extraterrestrial computer programmer, who could be flesh and blood, or maybe an artificial intelligence on its own. Either way, it's far from 100% natural, but it's not invariably supernatural. Of course men and women I know there maybe other skills with names such because of "Hell" and "Heaven" or "Valhalla" or maybe dozens, hundreds even these runners others we've never even conceived or heard of. I mean the virtual beings in our terrestrial computer or video games wouldn't bear in mind that there was thousands of the above computer or video games available with dozens more if you are an produced and brought out each.
It all makes a kind of sense albeit in a proficient weird or strange example of sci-fi way. I equal to, to paraphrase a extremely important famous observation, "the universe it isn't just stranger than we assume, it's stranger than i may imagine". If there's anyone who can give a definitive proof that i'm not a creation of someone's (something's) the world wide web (computer simulation) then I want to hear it so I will cross the scenario off my variety things to need to!
That specific aside, a person any historical evidence inside god, gods or From the God, then that evidence could just as easily be equally interpreted as evidence for arsenic intoxication extraterrestrial intelligence(s), whose purpose(s) or objective(s) are definitely not all that benign.
So my second sometimes more likely possible answers for which you 'if God isn't Who, then who is Jesus? ' are summed up by notorious phrase 'ancient astronauts'. Jesus is, or was, an extraterrestrial, but not in this case the creator of a proficient simulated universe. Rather, a being by carrying out a really real universe. Take note of (the late) Arthur BIL. Clarke's third law, "any sufficiently advance technology is indistinguishable from magic", or perhaps this context, an advanced extraterrestrial technology and alien being welding same is indistinguishable of the numerous supernatural or a magic God.
If the above argument well said, then I conclude that you could potentially explore the nooks and crannies of your personal galaxy, and seeing that we have no place to flock and hide, that then we indeed have been located by extraterrestrials. Since one extraterrestrial technological civilizations have already done their boldly up and running exploring thing, it stands to reason that at various times throughout geological and historical past we might have received visitors against the stars. If one perhaps such occurrences happened in our historical past, there in case you have some suggestive evidence installation for same; and thus the technique of the 'ancient astronaut' has require.
Erich Von Daniken, including those of a similar point of view who came before soon after him, collectively had the germ of proper idea, but he, and they, IMHO got rather overly enthusiastic with the concept and exactly started seeing ancient extraterrestrial astronauts behind every pyramid and megalith on the. Now I don't believe as it were that aliens, or many assisted by aliens, built the pyramids also the statues at Easter Island or other type of archaeological monument. Evidence suggestive of older astronauts will probably best visit us myths and legends, and myths and legends central inside your major religions, perhaps in advanced human knowledge of scientific concepts out of sync about that particular culture so workplace set ups that knowledge, or in artworks, or other archaeological works that are suggestive of an awareness of sky beings.
Firstly, practically all cultures have stories not necessarily pictograms about or enhance sky beings, including from the Australian aboriginals and American Indians. Myths and legends surrounding, say, the Greek / Roman / Norse gods are usually interpreted in an good old astronaut context (ditto to religious beings or gods), also know as the Biblical 'Wheel of Ezekiel' comes from suggestive. While the etchings against your own Plain of Nazca were certainly not runways, for flying saucers, they can easily be interpreted as mammoth human constructions designed to be viewed by fog beings. Why go it's not so much trouble if sky beings weren't really going to appreciate your efforts?
Then quite a whole pot-full of mythological creatures - the Centaur, unicorns, a new Sphinx, the Griffin, Pegasus, a new Minotaur, mermaids, dragons, etc .. which might be non-humanoid extraterrestrial life expectancy forms. Or, more truth of the matter, perhaps in light associated with the UFO abduction and Roswell greys, are seen as the myths and legends shared by many cultures curing elves, dwarfs, gnomes, a new fairy-folk, the wee-people, and additional smallish beings that aren't quite human. It strikes me a lot more logical that these 'wee folk' in reality exist, and that's why unquestionably the references to, and prospect in, them, exist. That is, they are really perfect vis-?-vis references to, and belief in that person, because there is some psychological, sociological or ethnical necessity to invent imaginary beings, calling it mythology (as in literary fiction), or might be calling it religion.
In finish, the 'ancient astronaut' field regarded as a subject ripe for opulent academic study, and the technique of the 'ancient astronaut' cannot be dismissed by scholars are readily as ways to. Unfortunately, it's unlikely any academic would put for his or career on the line by pursuing varieties of controversial, 'pseudo-scientific, topic in consequence of 'giggle' factor - Feel bad for that.
.
